In-ear Foundations
现代 ear-EEG 的早期 in-ear / ear-canal EEG 可行性验证,重点是 alpha、ASSR、AEP、MMN 和 P300。
这一组解决什么问题
这一组回答“耳内或耳道附近到底能不能记录到可用 EEG”。它不是 cEEGrid 本身,而是 ear-EEG 可行性、信噪比和适用任务边界的起点。
组内关系
Looney 论文偏早期平台和用户场景,Kidmose 论文偏 auditory evoked responses。读完这一组,应先形成一个保守判断:ear-EEG 对 ASSR、AEP、alpha 更友好,对远离耳部或方向不利的源更困难。
对自研的启发
自研系统早期验证不要一上来追复杂 AAD;先用 alpha、ASSR/AEP 这类稳健任务证明硬件和参考方案可用。
| # | Paper | Route | Stage | 一句话 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Looney et al., 2011 | in-ear EEG | early in-ear EEG | In-ear alpha increased after eye closure; temporal/mastoid correlations were strongest. |
| 02 | Looney et al., 2012 | in-ear EEG | early in-ear EEG | Ear-EEG showed AAR/ASSR/P300 with lower amplitude but usable SNR. |
| 03 | Kidmose et al., 2012 | ear-EEG | evoked-potential validation | Ear-EEG amplitudes were 10-20 dB lower, but SNR was comparable after averaging. |
| 04 | Kidmose et al., 2013 | ear-EEG | evoked-potential validation | ASSR was most favorable for ear sites; transient/visual responses were weaker. |