Skip to content
cEEGrid Guide

By Task

按实验任务阅读

如果你关心的是“我该做什么实验验证系统”,比起年份或路线,更应该按任务读。

alpha / resting-state 可行性

最适合硬件早期 sanity check:眼睁/眼闭 alpha、长时稳定性、基本 SNR。

PaperStageRead for
Looney et al., 2011early in-ear EEGMinimal viability test: EC/EO alpha plus scalp reference.
Looney et al., 2012early in-ear EEGValidate time, frequency, and ERP markers, not one task only.
Mikkelsen et al., 2015method characterizationUse ASSR/alpha as robust early benchmarks.
Debener et al., 2015cEEGrid originCore first replication: comfort, impedance, alpha, P300, cross-session classification.
Norton et al., 2015auricular BCI hardwareUseful for conformal soft-electrode design ideas.
Reali et al., 2021open-source real-world BCILow-cost prototype route; document channel map and timing.
Knierim et al., 2023amplifier benchmarkingMandatory timing test before ERP/AAD with OpenBCI.

ASSR / AEP / MMN 听觉诱发响应

ear-EEG 的优势任务之一,适合 hearing / auditory neuroscience 方向。

PaperStageRead for
Looney et al., 2012early in-ear EEGValidate time, frequency, and ERP markers, not one task only.
Kidmose et al., 2012evoked-potential validationHearing applications should start with ASSR/AEP/MMN.
Kidmose et al., 2013evoked-potential validationChoose validation tasks by source location and orientation.
Mikkelsen et al., 2015method characterizationUse ASSR/alpha as robust early benchmarks.
Goverdovsky et al., 201624/7 in-ear monitoringGeneric earpiece route must handle jaw motion and occlusion.
Denk et al., 2018hearing-device ERPControl acoustic/device artifacts in hearable EEG tests.
Van Den Broucke et al., 2023wireless hardwareABR needs different front end than OpenBCI/Smarting.

P300 / ERP / 视觉认知

用于验证耳部电极是否能捕获事件相关电位,但要注意振幅、源位置和 ear-only 性能。

PaperStageRead for
Looney et al., 2012early in-ear EEGValidate time, frequency, and ERP markers, not one task only.
Bleichner et al., 2015concealed EEG precursorReport whether performance is truly ear-only.
Debener et al., 2015cEEGrid originCore first replication: comfort, impedance, alpha, P300, cross-session classification.
Norton et al., 2015auricular BCI hardwareUseful for conformal soft-electrode design ideas.
Pacharra et al., 2017visual cognition validationAvoid motor LRP as first cEEGrid target.
Denk et al., 2018hearing-device ERPControl acoustic/device artifacts in hearable EEG tests.
Knierim et al., 2023amplifier benchmarkingMandatory timing test before ERP/AAD with OpenBCI.

auditory attention / AAD

最接近智能助听和注意力监测应用,但验证成本高,必须严格控制 chance、窗口长度和划分策略。

PaperStageRead for
Bleichner et al., 2016auditory attention validationFor AAD, prioritize vertical bipolar pairs and behavior checks.
Mirkovic et al., 2016target speaker detectionHonest AAD baseline and cap/ear layout comparison.
Holtze et al., 2022continuous-speech AADUse multi-metric AAD and nested validation.
Zhu et al., 2024multi-speaker AADUse 25% chance baseline and strict trial/subject-independent validation.
Geirnaert et al., 2025direct modality comparisonBest current route-comparison benchmark for AAD trade-offs.

sleep / long-duration monitoring

关注 PSG 对照、佩戴稳定性、用户错误、REM/NREM 区分和长时数据质量。

PaperStageRead for
Goverdovsky et al., 201624/7 in-ear monitoringGeneric earpiece route must handle jaw motion and occlusion.
Sterr et al., 2018sleep PSG comparisonSleep proof-of-concept needs PSG and user-error safeguards.
Mikkelsen et al., 2019sleep/wake machine learningUse PSG labels, LOSO validation, and derived cEEGrid channels.

hardware / OpenBCI / amplifier benchmarking

直接服务自研硬件路线:adapter、BOM、低成本放大器、时序校正、高采样无线前端。

PaperStageRead for
Reali et al., 2021open-source real-world BCILow-cost prototype route; document channel map and timing.
Knierim et al., 2022open hardwarePrimary replication guide for adapter, enclosure, routing, and artefact reference.
Knierim et al., 2023amplifier benchmarkingMandatory timing test before ERP/AAD with OpenBCI.
Van Den Broucke et al., 2023wireless hardwareABR needs different front end than OpenBCI/Smarting.