By Route
按技术路线阅读
同一篇论文可能属于多个路线桶。本页服务于路线理解,不等同于 manifest 里的唯一分类。
in-ear / ear-canal EEG 基础线
从耳塞、电极耳模和 ear-canal/concha 采集出发,验证 alpha、ASSR、AEP、MMN 等基础范式。
| Paper | Stage | Read for |
|---|---|---|
| Looney et al., 2011 | early in-ear EEG | Minimal viability test: EC/EO alpha plus scalp reference. |
| Looney et al., 2012 | early in-ear EEG | Validate time, frequency, and ERP markers, not one task only. |
| Kidmose et al., 2012 | evoked-potential validation | Hearing applications should start with ASSR/AEP/MMN. |
| Kidmose et al., 2013 | evoked-potential validation | Choose validation tasks by source location and orientation. |
| Mikkelsen et al., 2015 | method characterization | Use ASSR/alpha as robust early benchmarks. |
| Goverdovsky et al., 2016 | 24/7 in-ear monitoring | Generic earpiece route must handle jaw motion and occlusion. |
around-the-ear / cEEGrid 主线
围绕耳廓的柔性多电极阵列,强调隐蔽、多通道、移动和任务验证。
| Paper | Stage | Read for |
|---|---|---|
| Debener et al., 2015 | cEEGrid origin | Core first replication: comfort, impedance, alpha, P300, cross-session classification. |
| Bleichner et al., 2016 | auditory attention validation | For AAD, prioritize vertical bipolar pairs and behavior checks. |
| Mirkovic et al., 2016 | target speaker detection | Honest AAD baseline and cap/ear layout comparison. |
| Bleichner & Debener, 2017 | transparent EEG review | Define transparent EEG requirements beyond “wearable.” |
| Pacharra et al., 2017 | visual cognition validation | Avoid motor LRP as first cEEGrid target. |
| Sterr et al., 2018 | sleep PSG comparison | Sleep proof-of-concept needs PSG and user-error safeguards. |
| Mikkelsen et al., 2019 | sleep/wake machine learning | Use PSG labels, LOSO validation, and derived cEEGrid channels. |
| Holtze et al., 2022 | continuous-speech AAD | Use multi-metric AAD and nested validation. |
| Knierim et al., 2023 | amplifier benchmarking | Mandatory timing test before ERP/AAD with OpenBCI. |
| Van Den Broucke et al., 2023 | wireless hardware | ABR needs different front end than OpenBCI/Smarting. |
| Geirnaert et al., 2025 | direct modality comparison | Best current route-comparison benchmark for AAD trade-offs. |
miniaturized / auricle soft electronics 旁支
探索更隐蔽或更贴肤的电极形态,和 cEEGrid 目标接近但结构不同。
| Paper | Stage | Read for |
|---|---|---|
| Bleichner et al., 2015 | concealed EEG precursor | Report whether performance is truly ear-only. |
| Norton et al., 2015 | auricular BCI hardware | Useful for conformal soft-electrode design ideas. |
| Denk et al., 2018 | hearing-device ERP | Control acoustic/device artifacts in hearable EEG tests. |
OpenBCI / 低成本硬件路线
面向自研或开源复现,重点是 adapter、放大器、时序、通道映射和真实场景原型。
| Paper | Stage | Read for |
|---|---|---|
| Reali et al., 2021 | open-source real-world BCI | Low-cost prototype route; document channel map and timing. |
| Knierim et al., 2022 | open hardware | Primary replication guide for adapter, enclosure, routing, and artefact reference. |
| Knierim et al., 2023 | amplifier benchmarking | Mandatory timing test before ERP/AAD with OpenBCI. |
AAD 与路线直接比较
关注 auditory attention decoding、speaker decoding,以及 scalp / around-ear / in-ear 的性能取舍。
| Paper | Stage | Read for |
|---|---|---|
| Bleichner et al., 2016 | auditory attention validation | For AAD, prioritize vertical bipolar pairs and behavior checks. |
| Mirkovic et al., 2016 | target speaker detection | Honest AAD baseline and cap/ear layout comparison. |
| Holtze et al., 2022 | continuous-speech AAD | Use multi-metric AAD and nested validation. |
| Zhu et al., 2024 | multi-speaker AAD | Use 25% chance baseline and strict trial/subject-independent validation. |
| Geirnaert et al., 2025 | direct modality comparison | Best current route-comparison benchmark for AAD trade-offs. |