Paper Index
23 篇本地论文
本页由 metadata/us_papers.json、library/EVIDENCE_MATRIX.md 和详细论文卡片生成。每篇论文页面提供“这篇讲什么”、详细 close-reading 卡片、证据路径和回查入口;不发布 PDF 全文或抽取全文。
先从哪里读
- 不知道顺序:先看 Reading Map。
- 只想抓核心:先看 Key Papers。
- 按技术路线:看 By Route。
- 按实验任务:看 By Task。
| # | Paper | Year | Route | Stage | 一句话 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 01 | Looney et al., 2011 | 2011 | in-ear EEG | early in-ear EEG | In-ear alpha increased after eye closure; temporal/mastoid correlations were strongest. |
| 02 | Looney et al., 2012 | 2012 | in-ear EEG | early in-ear EEG | Ear-EEG showed AAR/ASSR/P300 with lower amplitude but usable SNR. |
| 03 | Kidmose et al., 2012 | 2012 | ear-EEG | evoked-potential validation | Ear-EEG amplitudes were 10-20 dB lower, but SNR was comparable after averaging. |
| 04 | Kidmose et al., 2013 | 2013 | ear-EEG | evoked-potential validation | ASSR was most favorable for ear sites; transient/visual responses were weaker. |
| 05 | Mikkelsen et al., 2015 | 2015 | ear-EEG | method characterization | Ear electrodes resembled temporal scalp channels; ASSR SNR was close to TP9/TP10. |
| 06 | Bleichner et al., 2015 | 2015 | miniaturized EEG | concealed EEG precursor | Ear HC site captured P300 with lower amplitude but similar effect size windows. |
| 07 | Debener et al., 2015 | 2015 | around-the-ear cEEGrid | cEEGrid origin | Stable impedance, alpha in 9/10, P300 around 400 ms, LDA about 70% across sessions. |
| 08 | Norton et al., 2015 | 2015 | auricle / soft electronics | auricular BCI hardware | Auricular soft electrodes supported 2-week alpha and high SSVEP spelling accuracy in small tests. |
| 09 | Bleichner et al., 2016 | 2016 | around-the-ear cEEGrid | auditory attention validation | cEEGrid median decoding 66% vs cap 70%; vertical long-distance pairs worked best. |
| 10 | Mirkovic et al., 2016 | 2016 | around-the-ear cEEGrid | target speaker detection | cEEGrid decoded attended speaker at 69.33% vs cap about 84.8%; spatial placement drove gap. |
| 11 | Goverdovsky et al., 2016 | 2016 | in-ear EEG | 24/7 in-ear monitoring | Impedance stayed mostly <10 kOhm; ASSR close to mastoid/temporal, SSVEP weaker. |
| 12 | Bleichner & Debener, 2017 | 2017 | around-the-ear cEEGrid | transparent EEG review | cEEGrid offers more spatial information than in-ear but less than cap; best as research platform. |
| 13 | Pacharra et al., 2017 | 2017 | around-the-ear cEEGrid | visual cognition validation | cEEGrid captured P1/N1, P300, and posterior/temporal ERL; motor LRP was weak. |
| 14 | Sterr et al., 2018 | 2018 | behind-the-ear cEEGrid | sleep PSG comparison | Sleep-stage kappa was moderate; 9/13 sleep parameters agreed well. |
| 15 | Denk et al., 2018 | 2018 | in-ear and around-ear | hearing-device ERP | cEEGrid SNR exceeded local in-concha; N100/P300 detected to device setting changes. |
| 16 | Mikkelsen et al., 2019 | 2019 | around-the-ear EEG | sleep/wake machine learning | Automatic cEEGrid beat actigraphy/manual cEEGrid and approached PSG-derived systems. |
| 17 | Reali et al., 2021 | 2021 | OpenBCI + cEEGrid | open-source real-world BCI | Low-cost setup captured Berger alpha, workload frequency effects, and ECG R-waves in 4/5 valid cases. |
| 18 | Knierim et al., 2022 | 2022 | OpenBCI + cEEGrid adapter | open hardware | Provides PCB/enclosure/BOM; impedance improved over minutes; bruxism F1=0.73 in held-out session. |
| 19 | Holtze et al., 2022 | 2022 | ear-EEG / cEEGrid | continuous-speech AAD | Envelope tracking about 71-72%; individualized non-nested tuning overfit; ISC and entropy added evidence. |
| 20 | Knierim et al., 2023 | 2023 | around-the-ear cEEGrid | amplifier benchmarking | OpenBCI can reproduce alpha/workload/P300 after lag/jitter correction; Smarting timing is cleaner. |
| 21 | Van Den Broucke et al., 2023 | 2023 | wireless around-the-ear cEEGrid | wireless hardware | 16 kHz, low-noise wearable design can record ABR-like waveforms from cEEGrid. |
| 22 | Zhu et al., 2024 | 2024 | ear-EEG | multi-speaker AAD | Four-speaker ear-EEG SR reached 41.3% at 60 s; deep ASAD claimed >90% at 1 s. |
| 23 | Geirnaert et al., 2025 | 2025 | scalp / around-ear / in-ear EEG | direct modality comparison | 60 s accuracy: scalp 83.44%, around-ear 67.22%, in-ear 61.11%; around-ear generalized better. |